[Developers]

Disclosure and Brady Analysis

A prosecutor preparing for trial discovers, two weeks before jury selection, that a detective's prior disciplinary file was never flagged as potential impeachment material. The Brady violation risk is significant and the

Category: ModulesLast Updated: Feb 5, 2026
modulesaireal-timecomplianceblockchain

Overview#

A prosecutor preparing for trial discovers, two weeks before jury selection, that a detective's prior disciplinary file was never flagged as potential impeachment material. The Brady violation risk is significant and the disclosure deadline has passed. AI-powered Brady analysis identifies this type of material automatically, scanning every evidence item in the case file and flagging it for attorney review before deadlines arrive, not after.

Prosecution offices, public defender organisations, and compliance teams at law enforcement agencies all carry disclosure obligations that manual review workflows struggle to satisfy at scale. The module manages the complete disclosure lifecycle from AI-assisted identification through organised packet production, deadline tracking, and compliance documentation, covering criminal justice, regulatory enforcement, and governmental legal proceedings.

Key Features#

AI-Powered Brady Analysis#

Automated scanning of case evidence identifies potentially exculpatory material, impeachment evidence, and mitigating information. The system categorises findings by Brady type, assigns confidence scores, provides rationale for each finding, and generates disclosure review recommendations. Analysis covers exculpatory evidence tending to negate guilt, impeachment evidence affecting witness credibility, mitigating evidence reducing culpability, procedural issues involving police or prosecution conduct, and identification concerns.

Disclosure Packet Management#

Create, organise, and track disclosure packets for defense counsel and other recipients. Evidence is organised within packets, sensitive information is redacted through the redaction engine, and recipient tracking with delivery confirmation documents every distribution. Cover letter generation references applicable legal obligations, and access logging creates an accountability trail.

Compliance Tracking#

Comprehensive deadline management ensures disclosure obligations are met on time. Status monitoring dashboards display pending reviews, overdue items, and upcoming deadlines. Complete audit trails document every decision. Exception handling workflows manage unusual circumstances, and automated reporting provides compliance summaries for supervisory review and quality assurance.

Workflow Automation#

Configurable assignment routing, multi-level approval workflows, notification triggers for approaching deadlines, extension request management, and completion tracking together make disclosure an organised operational process rather than an ad hoc effort. Supervisors maintain real-time visibility into the status of all pending obligations across their teams.

Exculpatory Detection#

AI analysis examines evidence for statement inconsistencies, contradiction identification, alibi evidence, alternative perpetrator indicators, and consent evidence. Items requiring human review are flagged with the analytical basis for each finding documented in the record.

Impeachment Analysis#

Automated identification of potential impeachment material covers witness inconsistencies across statements, prior bad acts, bias indicators, credibility concerns, and expert qualification issues. Findings are presented with supporting references to specific evidence items.

Continuing Disclosure Management#

New evidence entering the case file triggers supplemental disclosure reviews automatically. Cumulative disclosure history is tracked, and complete timelines of all packets sent maintain the completeness of ongoing obligations throughout the life of a case.

Use Cases#

  • Brady Material Review: AI scans case evidence for exculpatory material, flags items for attorney review, documents disclosure decisions with rationale, creates organised disclosure packets, and tracks recipient acknowledgment.
  • Discovery Response: Organise responsive evidence for discovery obligations, apply necessary redactions, create structured disclosure packets, track delivery and receipt, and document compliance with discovery rules.
  • Ongoing Disclosure: Monitor new evidence entering active cases for disclosure obligations, trigger supplemental disclosure workflows, and maintain timeline documentation ensuring completeness.
  • Compliance Auditing: Generate compliance reports showing disclosure status across all active cases, identify overdue items, track team performance against deadlines, and document organisational compliance with constitutional and statutory obligations.

Integration#

Connects with evidence management systems, investigation case management, document management, and audit trail platforms backed by PostgreSQL. Disclosure packets are generated from evidence already collected in the platform, and all disclosure activity is captured in the compliance audit trail with userId, organizationId, action, timestamp, and resourceId.

Open Standards#

  • RFC 3161 (Internet X.509 PKI Time-Stamp Protocol): every exported disclosure bundle and evidence package includes an RFC 3161 timestamp token (.tsr file) obtained from a configured Time-Stamp Authority, with the token imprint verified against the manifest SHA-256 to prove the bundle existed at a specific point in time.
  • CMS / PKCS#7 (RFC 5652, Cryptographic Message Syntax): disclosure bundles carry a detached CMS/PKCS#7 digital signature (SIGNATURE.p7s in DER encoding) over the manifest, enabling offline cryptographic verification of bundle authenticity and signer identity.
  • SHA-256 (FIPS 180-4): all evidence files and disclosure packet contents are individually hashed with SHA-256; a binary Merkle tree is computed from those leaf hashes to produce a tamper-evident manifest root that binds the entire bundle.
  • PDF/A (ISO 19005 series): disclosure bundle index documents are generated as PDF/A-3 (ISO 19005-3:2012) by default, with selectable variants including PDF/A-1B (ISO 19005-1:2005) and PDF/A-2B (ISO 19005-2:2011) to meet jurisdiction-specific court archival requirements.
  • X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (RFC 5280): the SIGNING_CERTIFICATE.pem accompanying each disclosure bundle is an X.509 certificate whose SHA-256 fingerprint is pinned and verified during offline bundle validation.
  • GraphQL (June 2018 specification): all Brady analysis, disclosure packet management, and Ward material analysis operations are exposed through a GraphQL API, with strongly-typed schemas for findings, packets, deadlines, and audit trail entries.
  • ISO 8601 (Date and Time Representations): all timestamps throughout the disclosure lifecycle, analysis timestamps, disclosure deadlines, approval records, recipient acknowledgements, and audit trail entries, are serialised in ISO 8601 format with UTC timezone.
  • MIME Media Types (RFC 2046): evidence items ingested for Brady analysis are classified by MIME type, routing PDF, plain text, image, audio, and video content to the appropriate text-extraction and AI-analysis pipelines.

Last Reviewed: 2026-02-05 Last Updated: 2026-04-14

Ready to Build?

Get started with our APIs or contact our integration team for support.